|
Denis Levaillant
|
|
|
The concept of "avant-garde" is still widely used in music today. Are you "avant-garde" ? I'm an author !. That is no answer. Yes it is, I believe creation consists both in breaking a tradition and continuing it, especially in music. You say "author", not "composer" ? "Composer" seems a bit too restrictive, music is not just chemistry. Do you prefer alchemy ? Yes, definitely, for its quest, its poetry. Music is more than just an architecture of sounds, it is above all a language. THE language ? Do you believe in the "neo" movement ? Absolutely not ! But it does express the new generation's deep longing for union rather than rupture. Music should return to a certain expression and, at the same time, to a larger audience. Does the past weigh on you ?. It nourishes me and impedes me. Music is probably the art form where the classics most crush the moderns. In a living society, it should be up to the moderns to choose which classics will endure and how their work will, be heard. As a pianist, though, you have not followed a classical itinerary. Why not ? When I perform I choose my pieces myself and I identify with them. So I am still acting like an author - of programs, of shows. It is the only way I can live : I make the pieces I play resonate with my own music. Do you improvise in the same way ? Absolutely. The more I grow, the more I see the relationships. The piano calls for this openness. In fact, a large part of my energy comes from improvisation, from taking these daily liberties. Liberty, energy... That sounds like jazz. Yes, and rythm too. I have been playing since 1969 and I've found a lot of real music in jazz and a lot of lessons. Are you against being a specialist ? The market forces us all to be specialists, but I fight it like a demon. I consider myself more of a "G.M.', a "general musician", for whom performing and composing are vital and complementary activities. Do you like technology ? It has invaded everything, no musician today can escape it. But often it is just mystification : a new sound does not necessarily mean new music. Computers will never be able to replace gesture. But the role of sound is becoming increasingly important in music. Of course. I even think that sound, from recording to broadcasting, to treatment, is an integral part of composing, and that the revolution in recording has been as radical for music as formal research has been. So radio is of value for the musician ? I would even say that radio should be made by musicians, even talk radio. When it began it was the berth of all research in sound, and it is still a very rich area for discovery, thanks to its variety, heterogeneity, theatricality... How about film ? It is a future vehicle for music. For its dissemination, of course, but also its creation. It is a largely unexplored territory. So the concert is an obsolete form today ? I think that any public musical event demands that an effort be made towards its performance. My first concert was a performance. Since then, I have taken part in some twenty of these adventures, either as a collaborator (theater, dance) or as the mastermind of the entire thing. We're far from "pure music" My dream of absolute purity is a music that you read for yourself alone. This practice is inexorably being lost. What musical form are you more interested in ? Today, opera, definitely. With opera, I can apply everything I know : vocal composition, polyphony, dramaturgy of instrumentation, electro-acoustic techniques, sound broadcasting. I have a great longing for renewal in that area. |